469 777-8373

FAIL (the browser should render some flash content, not this).

Archive for the ‘News’ Category

SEO Takes Time

February 21, 2011 @ 10:33 pm
posted Tim Antioch

Here are some reasons why SEO takes time and requires an ongoing investment:

CI Web Group | SEO ABC's | SEO Basics | SEO Pricing
1. Starting and running an SEOcampaign involves a lot of tasks

Many people think that ranking properly in the search engines involves some big secret that can be manipulated – if only we knew what it was. Unfortunately that is not the case and the secrets and tricks that we’ve used in the past are becoming rarer. To get started ranking in the search engines there are many, many things to do but they involve work, knowledge, experience, research and experimentation – not tricks. That work includes (but is not limited to) keyword research, setup of a sitemap, solving domain name and hosting concerns, website design and coding concerns, architectural/navigation concerns, content optimization and creation, analytics setup and integration, reporting, meetings, consultation, planning etc. (Just to name a few) Just the initial start of your SEO campaign can involve months of planning, research, setup, improvements and content creation just to get you ready to roll.

2. Search engine optimization must happen gradually and look natural

Google can be suspicious and easily spooked. For example, one of the most important parts of an effective SEO campaign is growing the number of high quality relevant links pointing to your site. Getting links to your site is important, but you can’t get them all at once. Manipulative link building is often temporary, while high quality links are hard to get and stand the test of time; Google knows this. If your site suddenly comes on the scene and immediately has hundreds or thousands of links, Google may sideline your site for an indefinite period of time. But, if your links grow organically and over time, your growth will look much more natural in the eyes of Google. Plus, to gain quality links it really does take time and a lot of effort. Link building is a very hard part of the SEO process to manipulate and Google likes it that way.

3. New sites don’t show up right away in the SERPs

Google and other alternative search engines can reward older websites with higher rankings in the SERPs. If you have a brand new site it’s rare that you will rank immediately. There may even be cases when your site will be placed in what has been called the “Google Sandbox“. This is a place in Googleland where sites go to await their birth on the scene. Google may do this to control the quality of their search results and to ensure that new sites are high quality before they show up in the results – although this is only a theory.  Doing things that look unethical and unnatural can also get you banned to the Sandbox so there is no value in trying to do things that are not natural and organic to get a “jump” on the competition. The words “natural and organic” themselves describe a process that requires patience.

4. Older sites tend to rank higher in the search results

As mentioned previously, there might be times where – if all things are created equal – you simply can’t initially rank above the competition because their site was created in, say, 1998 and your site came on the scene in 2008. Not to mention that chances are good that they’ve spent more time creating content, getting links etc. and it just takes time to catch up. Overcoming this obstacle can be one of the toughest hurdles insearch engine optimization and it requires a big investment in time, research and experimentation.

5. Local, national or global?

Depending on your target market, your SEO campaign goals might be much broader than another site; therefore taking more time to achieve results. Does your website target local customers or national? How about a possible world-wide audience? Do you have one niche product or hundreds of unrelated products or services? The answers to these questions will decide how much work is in involved, how much competition you’ll have, and ultimately, how difficult it’s going to be to rank. The more competition, the longer it’s going to take to overcome everyone in the rankings and rise to the top.

6. SEO Involves ongoing analysis

There are millions, possibly billions of total searches every day on the internet and Google has said that a majority of those searches are completely unique from day to day. That means that people are always finding completely unique ways to reword their searches and find what they’re looking for. Part of SEO involves analysis of how people arrive at your site. What words are they using? Are there ways that people are finding you that can be capitalized upon? Integrating analytics software into your site and constantly reviewing the results is essential to finding ways to improve your rankings. Taking the time to really digest what’s going on and then making the necessary changes or improvements takes time.

7. It takes time to develop content.

10 pages is not enough content to provide value and authority on any given subject and Google knows this all too well. So, by default, Google loves sites that are continually updated and improved. Many sites are basically online “brochures” that contain a certain number of pages and that’s only going to get you so far. This is one of the big reasons why blogs are so popular since they allow you to continually – and easily – add new content to your website. Developing new content takes creativity and skill and you can figure about 2 hours for every 500 word page that’s created on your site. Then, once the content is posted there is time involved with waiting for the engines to re-crawl your site and index the new content.

8. Do you want to rank for niche terms or broad terms?

Just like your target market, there are also concerns about your goals when ranking for broad terms or long tail niche terms. Let’s say that you sell exterior lighting and you ship your products world-wide. Everyone in the world is a potential customer, every lighting site is a competitor and the possible keyword combinations that you can rank for when targeting a broad category like this are endless. Now, lets say that another company sells Tiffany lamps instead of every type of lighting possible. You might still have a world-wide target market and many competitors, but now you’re operating in a specific niche that is much more targeted. A targeted niche campaign will yield faster results than a broad product or service campaign. It all depends on your goals. The bigger your goals, the longer it will take.

9. Competitors are always popping up and improving

I truly believe that SEO is a GREAT investment. As I’ve said before in my posts, you can equate PPC and SEOto renting vs owning ahome. If you invest in improving your organic SEO rankings, you’ll be investing in a position in the search engines that will stand the test of time – you’ll own that position. That said, things are always changing on the internet. New and old competitors are always appearing and rising and falling and there is no guarantee that you’ll always keep your current rank. Over time, competitors will force you to raise the bar higher and keep improving. Just like we try to rise your site to the top of the rankings, other competitors are trying to do the same so we always need to keep working and improving.

10. The web is constantly evolving

The competitive landscape is always changing, but, the world of search engine algorithms and SEO is changing even faster. I personally spend many hours each week trying to keep up and keep learning. It’s a never ending process to keep up with the news, tactics, changes and theories that surround the science of SEO and why sites ranking better than others. What might work this month, might not work at all next month so the way we practice search engine optimization must evolve as well.

Contact Lorri Antioch @ CI Web Group: lantioch@ciwebgroup.com         www.ciwebgroup.com

February: Internet & Social Media Marketing Training Events … http://conta.cc/g1Wp4l via #constantcontactSMEI Dallas Presents: Fusion Marketing System with Jennifer Bagley http://goo.gl/yLBaeFebruary Internet & Social Media Marketing Training Events -… http://conta.cc/eYHYpM via #constantcontactCome join us here. 12:00 – 1:00 pm CST, 641-715-3200 – 591320# SEO Stategies with http://www.JenniferBagley CEO of www.ciwebgroup.comFebruary Internet & Social Media Marketing Training Events -… http://conta.cc/dIMQ4W via #constantcontacthttp://t.co/ul1UtSFFebruary Events and Tony Jeary’s Top 50 Things Learned at 50 http://conta.cc/ijEMBh via #constantcontactCheck this video out — 1994: “Today”: “What is the Internet, Anyway?” http://t.co/v5DtyX1 via@youtube

 

Click here to find out more!

Maybe it’s the lack of a fully entrenched, overly conservative, business as usual HR departments.

This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert’s views alone.
Maybe it’s the lack of a fully entrenched, overly conservative, business as usual HR departments. Or maybe it’s because they live in a world free of lawyers, legalese, and “corporate” mumbo jumbo. Whatever the reason, start ups typically take the cake when it comes to finding rock star talent.
Take Argyle Social–a Durham, NC based startup in the business of social media marketing software. To get the word out, they started with a tweet that compared their team to a pack of rabid wolverines (known for their overwhelming ferocity and pound-for-pound strength). Although I’m sure their approach won’t work for some (including the rabbits and small rodents on which they typically prey), it will for those they’re ultimately going after–other current or aspiring rabid wolverines.

Argyle Tweet

The memorable and engaging tweet was just the beginning. The position description for their Client Services Associate opening starts off like many others, but continues to set the stage both in terms of the speed of your motor and your ability to fit with their culture. I particularly love the “Willingness to work harder than you’re working now” personal requirement and “Non-crappy taste in music” nice to have.

Argyle Description

Will they land a rock star? Time (motorhead) will tell. But regardless of the outcome, in a few short paragraphs and bucketed, bulleted lists, Argyle was able to inject their culture and personality into what could have been an otherwise sleeper of a job description.

Find Shawn Graham at CourtingYourCareer, on Twitter @ShawnGraham or via email at shawn(at)courtingyourcareer.com.

How to Measure Retweets

It’s said that on Twitter it’s not the number of followers you have that counts, it’s how many times you’ve been retweeted. And there’s some truth to that. While follower counts can be tricked, inflated or simply represent the number of people actively ignoring you, retweets show people actually engaging with what you’re putting out there. Having your content retweeted by your network means adding exposure, additional authority, and, more importantly, that people like what your brand is doing or saying. And that’s a pretty big metric to keep an eye on while participating in social media.
Last month I wrote about 5 ways to track Twitter sentiment. After that post, SmallBizTrends reader Mark Harbeke emailed me looking for tools to help him track retweets. I was able to offer him couple early recommendations, but it made me want to dig deeper to see what was available for SMB owners looking to track retweets.

Here are some of the most valuable tools I stumbled across to help SMB owners measure influence.

Twitter Search

All things start here. If you’re simply looking for a way to track retweets, then setting up a Twitter Search for [RT @username] and subscribing to the RSS feed will give you a very low maintenance way to do so. Of course, that’s also all you’re going to get with this option – no stats, no history, no nothing. But for some SMB owners that may be enough or even preferred. To be honest, while it’s not incredibly sexy, using Twitter Search to create an RSS list of terms I’m watching remains my preferred way to track mentions on Twitter. But I’m kind of boring.

Daily RT

This is one of my favorite retweet tools because it offers a lot of functionality for SMB owners looking to track their own Twitter success, as well as do some competitive intelligence on others. Daily RT allows SMB owners to see account follower numbers, how many RTs a user has made, how many times that user has been RT’d and the most popular content tweeted from that user. It’s that last statistic that I find especially valuable. Knowing what content your competitors are tweeting and what they’ve seen success with gives you insight into your own editorial calendar and what your community likes to hear about. It’s a breeding ground for strategy and new content ideas. I see Daily RT as much more of an all-round Twitter competitive intelligence tool than simply a tool for tracking RTs, but you can use or ignore as much of its functionality as you’re comfortable with. This is probably my favorite one of the bunch.

Tweet Reach

Tweet Reach takes a different approach with things and aims to measure how many people could have seen your tweet/link based on who retweeted it, how many people follow them, and how many followers you share between you. Once all that’s been calculated, you’re presented with a graph of your results.

Here’s a representation for my personal Twitter account, @lisabarone.

I often hear Tweet Reach being talked about by SMB owners, though I don’t think it’s the most powerful tool of the group. As is, Tweet Reach will only search through your last 50 tweets, so it may be somewhat limiting depending on how much you tweet. You can buy their $20 report in order to access your “full” results.

BackTweets

BackTweets is a great way to find out how many people are RTing or passing on a certain link that you tweeted. What makes it so valuable is that BackTweets will “count” the link regardless of how it was tweeted so you don’t get fragmented results based on URL shorteners. For example, one search for [yourdomain.com/title] will show all mentions of that link, regardless of whether they used bit.ly, tinyurl, owl.ly, etc. This helps to make monitoring considerably easier. You can also sign up to get email alerts so you don’t have to keep checking back with the site. Though I don’t use it to track retweets, BackTweets has long been my preferred way to track links passed through Twitter.

Retweetist

Though the look of this one is a little less refined, the functionality is surprisingly good. Enter in your username and ReTweetist will populate a list of your recent retweets and the users that retweeted them. You also have the option to enter in a URL instead of a username to see the same data (though that seems to be a bit wonkier). I like this one for SMBs looking to do some competitive intelligence because it also notes how many followers a particular account has and how often they tend to get retweeted, which is handy information to know. If you see that a competitor is being retweeted 500 times a week and you’re only being retweeted 100 times a week, you may want to take a closer look at their Twitter strategy and what’s working for them. Or go back up and use Daily RTs to get a sense of their content ideas.

Retweet Rank

Retweet Rank is different from the others in that it attempts to rank users by how often they’re retweeted and assigns a numerical score. If you’re looking to benchmark how you do against some of your closest competitors, that feature may make this tool more useful other some of the others.

Retweet Rank also breaks out your most recent retweets and suggests other users you may be interested in following and/or checking their stats. Once set up, there’s also an option to get your search via RSS so you don’t have to keep referring back to the site.

Coincidentally, Retweet Rank was one of the initial tools that I mentioned to SmallBizTrends reader Mark and he was kind enough to write a primer for SMBs looking to get set up on Retweet Rank. I recommend you give it a read.

Those are my favorite ways to track retweets on Twitter. Any great tools I’ve missed?

You might like:
Facts About Small Business Taxpayers
50 Places to Find Images for Every Small Business Need
How to Become a Celebrity in the Eyes of Your Niche
Business Failure Rates: What Percentage of Businesses Fail?
Business Failure Rates: What Percentage of Businesses Fail?
How to Become a Celebrity in the Eyes of Your Niche
50 Places to Find Images for Every Small Business Need
Facts About Small Business Taxpayers

About the Author

Lisa Barone is Co-Founder and Chief Branding Officer at Outspoken Media, Inc., an Internet marketing company that specializes in providing clients with online reputation management, social media services, and other Internet services. She blogs daily over at the Outspoken Media blog.
Connect with Lisa Barone:

Lisa Barone is Co-Founder and Chief Branding Officer at Outspoken Media, Inc., an Internet marketing company that specializes in providing clients with online reputation management, social media services, and other Internet services.

There is an old adage in the business world that says “the customer is always right.”         

 By Darren Slaughter

Common sense and plain old experience will tell us this is just not true. However, if a contractor wants to continue in business and see positive results from their marketing efforts they should always keep the customer first.

What exactly does this mean? Peruse through the local paper, the billboards, the television ads and the internet websites and what do you see over and over again? You see honest, hard working and knowledgeable contractors spending all their time and money talking about themselves. “Here is my product and my great prices, buy from me” is a common theme. Another theme is to see a picture of the contractor is his nice uniform standing next to his shiny work truck with some catchy slogan. What does that have to do with the customer?

Most customers are in the same frame of mind as a business owner talking to a vendor. They want to know what is in it for them. When the contractor spends the time to discuss a real problem that the customer may be experiencing and the solution to their problem, that is when the customer takes notice and contacts the contractor.

Whether it is a brochure, a newspaper ad or a website the contractor should focus on a problem and their unique way of fixing it. Notice that there is no mention of the lowest price or the quickest turn around. When people have a leaking roof, an air conditioner that does not work or cracked tile their first question is “Can you fix it?” Pricing is secondary when you are the one that has the answer.

Darren Slaughter blogs at http://darrenslaughter.com where he discusses construction marketing.

It’s official: engagement through social media has created the biggest brands in the world

A fascinating report by Charlene Li, a partner in the Altimeter Group, and Ben Elowitz, CEO of Wetpaint, examines the top 100 most engaged global brands as rated by BusinessWeek and Interbrand. It explains how brands fall into one of four engagement profiles depending on the number of social media (SM) channels they have and their depth of engagement in them.

The four profiles are:

Mavens – brands with seven or more SM channels with high levels of engagement across each. These brands have dedicated SM teams and ‘could not imagine operating without a strong presence in social media’. Examples include Starbucks and Dell.

Butterflies – brands with seven or more SM channels but lower levels of engagement across each. These brands ‘still struggle with getting the full buy-in from their organizations to embrace the full multi-way conversation that deep engagement entails’. Examples include American Express and Hyundai.

Selectives – brands with six or less SM channels with high levels of engagement across each. Often hamstrung by the lack of a dedicated SM team, they ‘focus on engaging customers deeply when and where it matters most’. Examples include retail group H&M and Philips.

Wallflowers – brands with six or less SM channels but lower levels of engagement across each. They are ‘cautious about the risks [of SM engagement], uncertain about the benefits, and therefore engage only lightly in the channels where they are present’. Examples include McDonald’s and BP.

Li and Elowitz apply their findings to the BusinessWeek/Interbrand 2008 list of the top 100 worldwide brands – and the results speak for themselves. The top 13 places are all filled by Mavens. The first Butterfly (Oracle) appears at number 14, the first Selective (H&M) at number 23 and the first Wallflower at a lowly number 51.

For the record, the top 10 are:

1. Starbucks

2. Dell

3. eBay

4. Google

5. Microsoft

6. Thomson Reuters

7. Nike

8. Amazon

9. SAP

10. Intel and Yahoo (joint result)

The most successful brands, by a proverbial country mile, are those that actively engage with their customers through a number of different social media channels. This doesn’t mean employing a vast SM team (Starbucks has just six people overseeing 11 SM channels), but it does prove that simply setting up a Facebook fan page and asking your customers to ‘like’ it isn’t enough.

Engagement is the cornerstone of relationship marketing and this report should provide food for thought for anyone who continues to doubt the engagement-creating opportunities offered by SM marketing.

Peter Applebaum is the Founder and Managing Director of Tick Yes.

Tick Yes is a social media marketing company based in Sydney that uses proven digital relationship marketing strategies to help clients improve brand awareness, increase market share and meet profit objectives.

For more information visit our website: http://www.tickyes.com/ or read more articles on our blog: http://tickyesblog.com/

By Peter Applebaum

The 4 Themes Of Team Building

1) Communication

Communication is a vital asset to any team – if members cannot converse or communicate with one another then ideas and development is unlikely to happen. Unsurprisingly the aim of communication in regards to team building is to facilitate interaction between team members often asking them to solve problems that require the team members to communicate with one another. On the flip side of that another approach to a communication exercise is to show the problems with bad communication.

2) Problem Solving/Decision making

Creative thinking can often be a very social activity. Often people work better when bouncing ideas off one another especially when the group gets on well. Problem solving activities focus on the group’s ability to solve complex problems through a consensus opinion. Whilst a solution may be presented by an individual the group will facilitate the development of the idea in to the solution through an agreed trial and error or discussing the logic behind the solution. Often problem solving activities mirror problems that are felt within the employees’ own field of work however more abstract problems are also helpful as they show creative members of the team.

3) Planning/Adaptability

Like problem solving the aim of planning exercises is to encourage participants to work together to solve a problem through planning. Exercises focus on the benefits of working as a team to produce solutions that have been planned out rather than rely on trial and error. Discussion is encouraged and shows team members how important it is to plan and discuss challenges.

4) Trust

Trust exercises are possibly the most complex in terms of theory. Essentially you are trying to instill a highly emotional bond between team members or at least prove that other team members can be trusted! Exercises clearly lean on the message that through trust you can progress and solve problems that are otherwise difficult to solve without trusting one another.

Whilst a few of these themes are quite complex ultimately the goal of any team building exercise is to help participants interact with other team members. Team building events gives businesses the opportunity to show that they are committed to developing the employees’ interpersonal skills and happiness. After all the very best team building exercises are rewarding and fun – certainly not forced and awkward!

De Vere’s training centers have excellent facilities that are perfect for team building events or all shapes and sizes.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Malcolm_Debris

Effective leaders and managers need to have enthusiastic followers.

Since people are your key source of competitive advantage, you need every single employee to be fully committed to taking the company forward and doing everything they can to make it a success in the future.

Unfortunately, the recession forced many companies to alter their course. In recession-altered workplaces, employees are often adrift, not really clear what the future holds for them or the company and not sure if or how they can make a difference.

This is where it becomes crucial to create a positive picture of the future that enthuses and energises the workforce and gives your employees something to believe in.

Imagination can have a powerful effect on motivation and belief. It can also have a direct effect on behaviour. Why do you think golf coaches advise their students to always visualise good shots, rather than think about all the ways the shot can be miss-hit?

Professional athletes and coaches in all sports know that imagining positive future scenarios is a powerful way to increase the likelihood of achieving a positive result. People become excited by their idea of a positive future, they become motivated to make it a reality and their behaviour becomes more focused on achieving the desired outcome. In the same way, you and your teams will have a much better chance of success if you create a picture of the future that leads to positive outcomes.

So how should you go about creating a positive future?

  • Involve your employees. The process of creating a positive future can be energising and engaging. Participation in creating their own professional future – and the future of their working environment – is often the critical factor in ensuring employees buy-in to the vision and take responsibility for making it happen.
  • Start with strengths. Even though you’ve gone through a difficult time, you and the company have survived. Establishing a strong foundation of strengths reminds the team of their skills and achievements and provides a starting point of positivity and optimism. Things to think about and discuss are:
    - What do we know about the strengths of the company, our team, each of the individuals?
    - In spite of all the things that we might want to change, what are we happy with?
    - What do we not want to lose as we move forward?
  • Describe the perfect future. If your organisation could be everything you dreamed, how would it be? Imagine the future as you want it to be, and then describe what you see in specific, detailed terms. In other words, look “back” from your success and see what helped you succeed in getting there. When this exercise is done with a team, they will typically see world-class processes, culture, technology, people and performance. Importantly though, this attractive picture of the future doesn’t just come from anywhere; because you started with strengths, it is built on the foundations of what you know you can do, meaning that the imagined perfect future is essentially both desirable and achievable.
  • Help each person identify the “What’s in it for me?” factor. Creating a positive future as a team is a great opportunity for synergy. However, while the whole team may have the same positive picture of the future, the benefits of making it a reality are likely to be different for each person. To really gain commitment and collective action, each employee needs to fully appreciate its meaning for them personally see what is in it for them personally.

 

Finally, demonstrate your own personal sense of excitement about the positive future you’ve created. Constantly express your personal confidence in ultimate success and endlessly seek, find and use examples of success and progress to build a sense of momentum.

Walt Disney was a genius at getting his employees committed to his organisation’s future. When he started his theme parks he was clear on their purpose and their strength. He said “We’re in the happiness business”. That is very different from being in the theme park business.

Walt Disney’s picture of the future was clear. “Keep the same smile on people’s faces when they leave the park as when they enter”. He didn’t care whether a guest was in the park two hours or ten hours. He just wanted to keep them smiling. A clear picture of the future drives everything the cast members (employees) do with their guests (customers) and inspires excitement, commitment and ownership for making that picture a reality.

Head over to Antoinette Oglethorpe’s blog to get more free articles and resources on Motivating Employees

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Antoinette_Oglethorpe

This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert’s views alone.
Personal branding guru Dan Schawbel and brand identity guru David Brier face off.

BY FC Expert Blogger David BrierMon Sep 27, 2010

I recently interviewed Dan Schawbel, the author of the forthcoming Me 2.0: 4 Steps to Building Your Future, the founder of the syndicated Personal Branding Blog, publisher of Personal Branding Magazine, and a columnist with BusinessWeek. Recently, Dan was named to the prestigious Inc. Magazine 30 Under 30 list.

In this exclusive interview, Dan sheds light on the misunderstood realm of personal branding.

David: First off would you define “personal branding” as distinct from pitching oneself in the ordinary, hit-the-streets approach?
Dan: Personal branding is all about discovering what makes you special, and then communicating it to the right people, through multiple channels. We all have personal brands because we’re constantly being judged based on first and last impressions, and because we always have to sell ourselves in interviews and in social settings. We also have an inherent need for self-differentiation because of how competitive the world is on a global scale and because people love to feel unique in their own way.

In the business world, it’s imperative that we brand ourselves as experts in our field because that’s how you get noticed, and get hired. You need to stand for something, target a specific audience, and base your brand around authenticity and your talents. Since the Internet is the global talent pool, you have to have an online presence, so people can find you, hire you, or do business with you. I recommend a blog under your full name, as well as profiles on social networks like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. I also recommend that you have your own motto, logo/professional picture, and a unique design that you can leverage across your entire online presence.

David: How does personal branding differ from corporate or product branding?
Dan: Personal branding really exists because people can borrow the same strategies as product and corporate brands. For instance, you get a consistent experience at McDonalds all around the world, and whenever you watch Jimmy Kimmel on TV, you know what to expect from him. While consistency is an important factor in branding, products and people both have to stand for something, have missions, values, and goals behind them. Both people and products base their value and “price” off of supply and demand in the marketplace, and every brand needs a Web site, and a presence in social media.

People need to start acting more like companies and companies need to start acting more like people these days. Consumers are begging to purchase from a human-faced business. You won’t get the same time of emotion and connection with a product than a person you meet and get along with. A person’s body language is more powerful than any product you can purchase on the market too. The biggest difference between personal and corporate branding is scalability. People can’t scale but companies can.

David: What tips do you have for someone who wants to really carve out their niche for their personal brand? Can you cite some excellent examples?
Dan: Some of the people who have excelled at personal branding include Marcus Buckingham, who developed the “strengths movement,” and has become known to the media as “the strengths and personal development expert.” Also, there’s Tim Ferriss, who branded himself as the lifestyle design expert, which was new, hip, and attracted a lot of interest. We can learn a lot from Oprah and Donald Trump, who put their name on everything they do, create and license. When I think about escaping corporate America, I think of Pam Slim first because she’s positioned herself as the top-of-mind brand in that area.

If you want to successfully develop your personal brand, you have to be as specific as you can with the audience you want to go after. Don’t bother being a social media guru, marketing expert, or personal finance expert. You need to be more specific than that if you want to stand out, get noticed, and get job opportunities or new business. Become the top marketing expert in Philadelphia or the top social media guru for reaching millennials. By getting specific, you can differentiate yourself and attract new opportunities. Before developing your online identity, have clear short and long-term goals, and understand your audience as much as you possibly can.

 

David: How can social media be used as a crutch thus inhibiting someone’s personal brand?
Dan: A lot of people think that just by establishing social media profiles that they will get press and new clients. There are over one hundred million people on Twitter, over five hundred million people on Facebook, and over seventy-five million people on LinkedIn. This isn’t 2005 anymore. You need to work as hard as you can to actually leverage your online presence to pull in new readers, and leads. Having millions of fans on social networks doesn’t mean anything anymore because there’s very little direct revenue impact, trust me. What you need to do is to use them so that you’re connecting only with potential buyers and influencers and then invest as much time as possible to build relationships with them. Also, you need to use social media to pull people into your main Web site because that’s where you can actually convert them.

David: Can the principles of personal branding be applied to larger corporations? If so, what recommendations do you have for larger corporations to make good use of this approach?
Dan: Every single company needs to train their employees to become spokespeople now. You need to get everyone on the same page, with the right message, and to the right audience. There should be guidelines though so people have a reference point. Companies should have a human face so that they can talk to their market like a person, instead of a machine. Press releases and other old media are becoming less relevant, while people (who have personalities) are becoming more relevant over time. Seek people in your company that can bring it to life.

While we both have “our sides if the story” regarding branding, there is the common component of differentiation and refusing to blend in. Additionally, there is a correct assessment of who your audience is.

Done correctly, you will have a brand that knocks it out of the ballpark for all of the right reasons, and not as a result of mere fate. I want to thank Dan Schawbel for joing me in sharing these thoughts with the professional community.

David Brier is an award-winning brand identity designer, author, and branding expert. His firm’s work has won the admiration of peers and organizations but, more importantly, has helped clients jump-start their brands in new and innovative ways, even (and especially) when they’ve failed in previous brand makeovers.

This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert’s views alone.
Personal branding guru Dan Schawbel and brand identity guru David Brier face off.

BY FC Expert Blogger David Brier

In business, differentiation is one of the watchwords that guide the best and most successful brands. How else can anyone–or any product or business–get any recognition? With the endlessly growing number of voices seeking to be heard on every front, how does one get heard in a world that’s too busy to listen? How does one rise above this rising tide of mediocrity?

A Rare Combination of Minds
Recently, a unique opportunity arose with two branding leaders: personal branding guru Dan Schawbel and brand identity guru David Brier (yup, that’s me). Each is an author with his own industry-leading books as well as regularly writing articles and blog posts. Each is passionate about their respective zone of expertise and that’s where the similarities end. While the areas they solve for a wide range of clients are quite distinct, the principles they each use provide great insight into some universal branding truths.

Dan Schawbel is the author of the forthcoming Me 2.0: 4 Steps to Building Your Future. He is the Managing Partner of Millennial Branding, the founder of the syndicated Personal Branding Blog, publisher of Personal Branding Magazine, and a columnist with BusinessWeek. Recently, Dan was named to the prestigious Inc. Magazine 30 Under 30 list.

David Brier is an award-winning brand identity designer, author and branding expert. He is the recipient of over 300 industry awards and is the Chief Gravity Defyer (e.g., Creative Director) of DBD International. He is the author of Defying Gravity and Rising Above the Noise codifying the 8 principles of brand elevation with case studies for companies as divergent as Revlon, Legacy Chocolates, Botanical Bakery, New York City Ballet and the legendary Joanna Vargas Salon in New York City.

The Personal Guru Takes on the Brand Identity Expert

Recently, Dan Schawbel interviewed me and asked me about brand identity for people and companies with questions about logos and slogans, and more. Here’s the interview.

Dan: What goes into a corporate brand identity? Would this be similar for a personal brand?
David: The basics of “a brand” are largely misunderstood. While aesthetics, design and appearance are of considerable and noteworthy importance, a brand has as its primary function, differentiation. Why? Because if everyone is doing this and that in our age of information overload, they all blend into one mass confusion or a sea of noise. My most favorite description of this phenomena is “a sea of sameness.”

Here are some facts: People have less time to absorb more information ever than in history. Each year, 26,000 new products will come out. It was mentioned recently that as many as 50 million tweets were posted in a single day. Just the other day, Google reported that 293 million searches were conducted in a single day. One report stated that a new blog is started every half second.

So with that being the marketplace, one must consider what will be “a brand” that will stand apart from the chaos.

A corporate brand must reflect the company but more importantly, it must 1) be distinct from the competition and 2) resonate with the intended audience. Apple’s iPod which was the 3rd or 4th MP3 player on the market became the champion because it tackled both of those points remarkably well. It identified to whom their product would be meaningful: teenagers and those in their 20- and 30-somethings and did it in a way that stood heads and heels above anything before it.

The same holds true for a personal brand.

But in the “personal brand” category, what I see a lot of people do–who may write well or have charisma or are passionate–is ignore the power of design and great overall presentation. The great corporate brands, such as Apple, Harley Davidson or Nike (or Martha Stewart for that matter) know the value and importance of design, language, photography, color and all those components that great corporate brands know. I see these as the most overlooked and abused aspects in personal branding.

I recently wrote a free eBook entitled “The Lucky Brand” which covers some of these points in detail.

Dan: What’s more important, a logo or a slogan for a brand?
David: I wouldn’t say either is more important, and I wouldn’t say its a choice. This is like asking, what’s more important, the shirt or the tie? Or the dress or the shoes. I would say it’s the ensemble and how the pieces work together. You could ask yourself, would Apple be where it is today without its world-famous “Think different” campaign? Yet today, you simply see the icon, no words.

Each brand is its own unique vision and creates its own vocabulary. In the 30 years I’ve been creating brands, sometimes one factor is more important and plays a more prominent role than the other.

But both dress a brand up for success.

Dan: How has your role as a brand strategist changed in the past decade. What are customers looking for now?
David: I would say my role has become more comprehensive.

Ten to fifteen years ago, clients would need branding solutions that were more visually based. Today, there’s this other factor: the channel of social media. I stress this as a channel because some clients have come to us passionate over this new strategy: Social media. I then explain social media is not a strategy, it is a channel upon which the right branding and the right messages can be distributed. So, now I merely add that into the mix of our planning and anticipation to make what we create work on those additional channels.

Still, my role is helping the client focus on this: Give me 4-6 reasons their customers should give a damn about their product. Then converting that into something remarkable, captivating, engrossing and exciting. If you don’t have that, you’ll never arrive at that terrific “dialog” everyone talks about having with their customers. Well, it’s hard to have a conversation of you’re invisible.

Dan: When a company is seeking your help but they have no differentiation in their market, what questions do you ask?
David: Ooh, this is like asking the secrets to making a brand kick its competition’s ass. There are some “usual suspects” I seek out.

Here are some key ones:

  • Who are the leaders in their industry?
  • Do they offer anything exclusive that their competition does not offer?
  • I know you’re great, but so is everyone else (the truth hurts, but the competition also think they’re the cat’s meow). So, why should your prospective customer care about what you’re offering?
  • What can be done that will set you apart?
  • What “the standard” to which everyone operates?

That’s why Dyson was able to put all the other vacuum cleaners to shame because all them grew complacent making incremental improvements, but Dyson rewrote the rule book. Like Apple did with iPhone.

Dan: How has social media impacted the brand of your business and yourself?
David: Social media has been interesting and very beneficial because there’s that much more of a channel of communication to convey what you’re about. It’s also wide open virgin territory, where you can reach the world with greater ease. The trick is having something to say in a unique way.

For example I wrote the book entitled, “Defying Gravity and Rising Above the Noise.” To make that work as a brand, my URL is risingabovethenoise.com and my title is Chief Gravity Defyer. That snowballs into a communication that’s more memorable than “brand specialist” or “brand identity expert.” Those would be accurate (with a gazillion others using those same words and titles) but those wouldn’t differentiate. This comes in handy with social media.

I kind of fell into social media. I’m not a first adopter when it comes to technology but when I get on, I start to create wildly. So, now I am an expert blogger on two continents. The U.S. one is on Fast Company magazine. I am the number one submitter of information on about four categories on BusinessWeek’s Business Exchange (I think its Brand Identity, Brand Strategy, Graphic Design). I have a steady stream of business owners who purchase my book and my free ebook, “The Lucky Brand.” I also have had thousands of people view my presentations on Slideshare. So, there are a lot of avenues not including articles you can find. Video will the next area to majorly tackle.

Here’s a great example of the power of social media: I submitted the work we created for one client out of Napa Valley which subsequently got onto about 20+ blogs resulting in their getting inquiries from France to sell their product. Without social media, that would have never happened.

Part 2 is here.

David Brier is an award-winning brand identity designer, author, and branding expert. His firm’s work has won the admiration of peers and organizations but, more importantly, has helped clients jump-start their brands in new and innovative ways, even (and especially) when they’ve failed in previous brand makeovers.

Face-Off: Zuckerberg Versus the ACLU [Updated]

September 29, 2010 @ 6:10 am
posted Tim Antioch

Today Facebook unveiled Places

BY Austin CarrToday

…… its new “check in” feature designed to take on geo-location services such as Gowalla and Foursquare. Within hours of the announcement, the ACLU responded with a list of criticisms, chastising the social network for its lack of adequate privacy measures. Essentially, the ACLU charged Facebook with not giving users “full control” over the service.

Now Facebook has responded. Below is an open letter on the issue we just received from Facebook’s director of policy communications, Barry Schnitt, who says that all of these points were delivered to the ACLU before they published their warning.

In the statement, Facebook attempts to show just how much control users actually have over Places. The social network carefully explains the measures it has taken, contending that it’s offered explicit and accessible options to customize how much information is shared.

Facebook also calls the ACLU “misinformed” and says it ignores the lengths the company has gone through to ensure privacy. 

UPDATE: The squabble continues. The ACLU just posted another response to Facebook. The organization says it appreciates the privacy options currently available to Places users, but recommend three “straightforward steps” to provide further safeguards:

1. Limiting the default visibility of check-ins on your feed to “Friends Only.”
2. Allowing you to customize your check-in privacy.
3. Providing notice to you each time you are checked in by a friend.

So the back and forth continues, centered mainly on what default options are appropriate to a user’s privacy. The ACLU persists in its initial claim that “no” is not an option in Facebook: “If your friend tries to check-in for you, you have two choices: ‘Allow Check-Ins’ and ‘Not Now.’ Until you hit ‘Allow Check-Ins,’ you cannot be checked into a Place by a friend. But you are not given an option, like ‘No’ or ‘Don’t Allow,’ that would opt you out of Places. Instead, all you can do immediately is hit ‘Not Now,’ which just means ‘ask me again later.’”

Come on, Facebook, no means no!

Check out Facebook’s original response to the ACLU’s stance below:

Facebook Places sets a new standard for user control and privacy protection for location information. We’re disappointed that ACLU’s Northern California office ignores this and seems to generally misunderstand how the service works.

Specifically, no location information is associated with a person unless he or she explicitly chooses to become part of location sharing. No one can be checked in to a location without their explicit permission. Many third parties have applauded our controls, indicating that people have more protections using Facebook Places than other widely used location services available today …

Assertion: Facebook is rolling out “here now,” privacy later.
The facts: The current settings already enable you to easily make yourself visible to only a specific group of people on a Place page. All you need to do is turn off “Here Now” and set your “Places I check-in” control to the appropriate setting for the visibility you want. They are demanding that you, instead, customize two settings to get the same result. While we appreciate their feedback, they are just wrong that more complexity is better here …

Finally, it’s important to note that Here Now is not enabled if you’ve set your master privacy control to Friends of Friends or Friends or if you’ve customized your settings to be restrictive.

Assertion: Places data is on the move.
The facts: For those who choose to share their location, we offer additional controls that restrict the ability of applications to get information about their location. Applications you use must request and receive access through a clearly labeled and simple permissions dialog before accessing your check-ins.

Your friends can share your check-ins with applications and we feel there is the potential here to make really compelling social experiences. However, all you need to do is uncheck a box in your privacy settings under “Applications and Websites” to prevent this info from being shared by your friends. And, if you’ve already gone in and unchecked the other boxes, the Places I check-in box will be unchecked for you by default.

Assertion: In the world of Facebook Places, “no” is unfortunately not an option.
The facts: Again, this is misinformed. Every person on Facebook must agree before they check in or can be checked in to a place. Before you have agreed and someone tries to tag you, you are not associated with any location.

In addition, the story your friend tagged you in does not show up on your profile until you have agreed to allow it. Also, the message that lets you know a friend would like to check you in includes a link to Learn More, which explains how to stop getting these messages.

Finally, ACLU NC ignores the many protections built into the system—only confirmed friends can try to check you in, to tag you a friend must also check themselves in, you are notified every time someone tries to check you in, and you can easily remove any tag.

http://www.fastcompany.com/user/austin-carr

www.fastcompany.com

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829